At the national level, we have no idea which of both effects is dominant. Many national variables influence wellbeing, specifically the generosity of the welfare state and variables such as for example unemployment (DiTella et al. 2001, DiTella et al. 2003, and Radcliff 2013). But recent research on subjective wellbeing, described in sources such as for example Easterlin (2003), Oswald (1997), Layard (2005) and Clark (2018), has paid little focus on the role of advertising, therefore there are no cross-country econometric studies of the result of advertising using representative samples of adults.
Maintaining the Joneses
In this context, is an acceptable hypothesis that advertising includes a negative influence on wellbeing. Easterlin (1974) discovered early evidence suggesting that society will not become happier since it grows richer. He suggested that one mechanism may be that folks compare themselves with their neighbours. Easterlin’s thesis, partly, assumes that people desire conspicuous consumption (Veblen 1899, 1904).
If people have ‘relativistic’ preferences, so they look at others before making a decision how satisfied they feel, when they consume more goods, they neglect to become happier because they see others also eating more. The pleasure of my new car is recinded if Ms Jones, in the parking spot next to mine, in addition has just bought one. Newer evidence on ‘comparison effects’ has been reviewed by Clark (2018). Mujcic and Oswald (2018) also find longitudinal proof negative wellbeing consequences predicated on envy.
Since Veblen, many researchers have concerned about unwanted effects on wellbeing of advertising. In some instances they have found small-scale evidence (for example Richins 1995, Easterlin and Crimmins 1991, Bagwell and Bernheim 1996, Sirgy et al. 1998, Dittmar et al. 2014, Frey et al. 2007, and Harris et al. 2009). Research has centered on the likely detrimental effects upon children (Andreyeva et al. 2011, Borzekowski and Robinson 2001, Buijzen and Valkenburg 2003a, Opree et al. 2013, and Buijzen and Valkenburg 2003b), although the newest work, by Opree et al. (2016), produced inconclusive results.
Evidence of a poor effect
We’ve found proof negative links between national advertising and national wellbeing (Michel et al. 2019). Using longitudinal information on countries, from pooled cross-sectional surveys, we find that rises and falls in advertising are followed, a couple of years later, by falls and rises in national life-satisfaction, giving an inverse connection between advertising levels and the later wellbeing degrees of nations.
We took an example of slightly over 900,000 randomly sampled European citizens in 27 countries, surveyed annually from 1980 to 2011. Respondents reported their degree of life satisfaction and several other areas of themselves and their lives. We also recorded total advertising expenditure levels.
Figure 1 illustrates the study’s key idea. It divides the info into tertiles and plots the (uncorrected) relationship between your change in advertising and the change in life satisfaction. The three vertical bars separate the info into countries that had particularly large increases in advertising expenditure, moderate increases, and small increases. Figure 1 demonstrates the higher the rise in advertising within a nation, small the later improvement in life satisfaction.
Figure 1 The inverse longitudinal relationship between changes in advertising and changes in the life span satisfaction of countries, 1980 to 2011
Notes: Predicated on a sample of around 1 million individuals. Predicated on shorter period if data unavailable for that country. Bottom Tertile includes Czech Republic, Germany after 1989, Estonia, Finland, Lithuania, Hungary, Latvia, Poland, Romania, Slovakia. Mean change 2.93. Middle Tertile includes Bulgaria, Western Germany (before 1989), Denmark, UK, Sweden, Slovenia, Netherlands, Turkey, Spain. Mean Change: 2.15. Top tertile includes Austria, Belgium, France, Greece, Croatia, Ireland, Italy, Norway, Portugal. Mean change 1.46.
Advertising doesn’t have a spurious association with life satisfaction that’s attributable merely to the business enterprise cycle. Using standard regression analysis, we could actually show that the negative aftereffect of advertisement on life satisfaction isn’t as a result of correlation of both variables with the GDP. This negative effect is robust to the inclusion of other variables like country and year fixed effects, unemployment, and individual socioeconomic characteristics that are usually contained in any happiness equation.
The effect means that a hypothetical doubling of advertising expenditure would create a 3% drop in life satisfaction. That’s approximately half the absolute size of the marriage influence on life satisfaction, or approximately one quarter of the absolute size of the result to be unemployed.
These email address details are consistent with concerns which were first aired greater than a century ago, and regularly since (Veblen 1904 and Robinson 1933, for instance). They are in keeping with Easterlin (1974, 2003) and Layard (1980). They could also be in keeping with ideas about the negative consequences of materialism (Sirgy et al. 2012, Burroughs and Rindfleisch 2002, Speck and Roy 2008, and Snyder and Debono 1985).
Although there is proof an inverse longitudinal relationship between national advertising and national dissatisfaction, we still have to uncover the causal mechanism. But this demands investigation, as the size of the estimated effect here’s both substantial and statistically well-determined.
Andreyeva T, I R Kelly, R Inas, and J L Harris (2011), "Contact with food advertising on television: Associations with children’s junk food and soda consumption and obesity", Economics and Human Biology 9: 221-313.
Bagwell L S and B D Bernheim (1996), "Veblen effects in a theory of conspicuous consumption", American Economic Review 86: 349-373.
Borzekowski D L G and T N Robinson (2001), "The 30-second effect: An experiment revealing the impact of television commercials on food preferences of pre-schoolers", Journal of the American Dietetic Association 101: 42-46.
Buijzen M and P M Valkenburg PM (2003a), "The unintended ramifications of television advertising: A parent-child survey", Communication Research 30: 483-503.
Buizjen M and P M Valkenburg PM (2003b), "The consequences of television advertising on materialism, parent-child conflict, and unhappiness: An assessment of research", Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 24: 437-456.
Burroughs J E and A Rindfleisch (2002), "Materialism and well-being: A conflicting values perspective", Journal of Consumer Research 29: 348-370.
Clark A E (2018), "Four decades of the economics of happiness: Where next?", Overview of Income and Wealth 64: 245-269.
Di Tella R, R J MacCulloch, and A J Oswald (2001), "Preferences over inflation and unemployment: Evidence from surveys of happiness", American Economic Review 91: 335-341.
Di Tella R, R J MacCulloch, and A J Oswald (2003), "The macroeconomics of happiness", Overview of Economics and Statistics 85: 809-827.
Dittmar H, R Bond, M Hurst M, and T Kassar (2014), "The partnership between materialism and personal well-being: A meta-analysis", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 107: 879-924.
Easterlin R A (1974), Does economic growth enhance the human lot? Some empirical evidence, in: P A David and M W Reder (eds.), Nations and households in economic growth: Essays honoring Moses Abramowitz. Academic Press: 89-125.
Easterlin R A (2003), "Explaining happiness", Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the united states 100: 11176-11183.
Easterlin R A and Crimmins E M (1991), "Private materialism, personal self-fulfillment, family life, and public interest", Public Opinion Quarterly 55: 499-533.
Frey B, C Denesch, and A Stutzer (2007), "Does watching TV makes us happy?", Journal of Economic Psychology 28: 283-313.
Harris J L, J A Bargh, and K D Brownell (2009), "Priming ramifications of television food advertising on eating behaviour", Health Psychology 28: 404-413.
Layard R (2005), Happiness: Lessons from a fresh science, Penguin.
Michel C, M Sovinsky, E Proto, A J Oswald (forthcoming), "Advertising as a significant Way to obtain Human Dissatisfaction: Cross-National Evidence using one Million Europeans", to be published in 2019 in a volume honoring Richard Easterlin.
Opree S J, M Buizjen and E A van Reijmersdal (2016), "The impact of advertising on children’s psychological wellbeing and life satisfaction", European Journal of Marketing 50: 1975-1992.
Oswald A J (1997), "Happiness and economic performance", Economic Journal 107: 1815-1831.
Radcliff B (2013), The political economy of human happiness: How voters’ choices determine the caliber of life, Cambridge University Press.
Robinson J (1933), Economics of imperfect competition, Macmillan.
Sirgy M J, D J Lee, R Kosenko, H L Meadow, D Rahtz, M Cicic, G Xi Jin, D Yarsuvat, D L Blenkhorn, and N Wright (1998), Does television viewership are likely involved in the perception of standard of living? Journal of Advertising 27: 125-142.
Sirgy J M, E Gurel-Atay, D Webb, M Cicic, M Husic, A Ekici, A Herrmann, I Hegazy, D-J Lee, and J S Johar (2012), "Linking advertising, materialism, and life satisfaction", Social Indicators Research 107: 79-101.
Snyder M and K G Debono (1985), "Attracts image and claims about quality – Understanding the psychology of advertising", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 49: 586-597.
Speck S K, A Roy (2008), "The interrelationships between television viewing, values and perceived well-being: A worldwide perspective", Journal of International Business Studies 39: 1197-1219.
Veblen T (1899), THE IDEA of the Leisure Class, Macmillan.
Veblen T (1904), THE IDEA of COMPANY, Charles Scribner’s Sons.